HSRProj will be retired on September 14, 2021, no updates will be made to HSRProj after this date.
Detailed information about this transition can be found on the June 3, 2021 Technical Bulletin post.
If you have questions or suggestions, please contact NLM Customer Service.
Information about ongoing health services research and public health projects
|Midwestern collaborative for treating obesity in rural primary care|
|Investigator (PI):||Befort, Christie|
|Performing Organization (PO):||
(Current): University of Kansas Medical Center, School of Medicine, Department of Population Health / (913) 588-2775
|Supporting Agency (SA):||Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)|
|Record Source/Award ID:||PCORI/OB-1402-09413|
|Funding:||Total Award Amount: $10,074,141|
|Award Information:||PCORI: More information and project results (when completed)|
|Abstract:||Background: Nearly 20% of the U.S. population lives in rural communities. Rural residents suffer disproportionally from obesity and have less access to effective weight loss programs. Primary care offices have the potential to fill an important need in treating obesity in rural America. Primary care is traditionally provided as a fee-for-service with 15-minute office visits. Two new approaches for managing chronic diseases in primary care are the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) and disease management (DM). Both PCMH and DM approaches offer coordinated delivery of services that extend beyond the limitations of a face-to-face office visit. With the PCMH model, services are provided within the primary care practice whereas with DM, services are provided by a centralized counselor by telephone. Both PCMH and DM approaches allow professionals with more specific training in weight loss counseling to provide care and offer enhanced patient access with after-hours group visits, phone visits, and email/text message support. Objectives: This study will compare PCMH and DM to the traditional fee-for-service model for treating obesity in rural primary care practices in the midwestern United States. Methods: Thirty-six practices located in Kansas, Nebraska, Wisconsin, and Iowa will be randomized to one of the three treatment approaches. Patient outcomes: The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Not only is weight loss the goal of clinical guidelines, it is also highly important to patients. Other outcomes important to patients include laboratory measures, quality of life, sleep quality, and levels of stress. Patient and stakeholder engagement: Our Patient Advisory Panel has shaped the treatment approaches, participant characteristics, and defined outcomes that are important to them. We also have engaged local, state, and national stakeholders including rural primary care providers, insurers, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the National Committee for Quality Assurance, and state health departments. Our engagement plan includes an in-person day-long meeting at the outset of the study with all patient partners, stakeholders, and investigators where we will make our patient-centered approach the foundation for implementing the study, communicate the roles of each group, and establish consensus building as the decision-making approach. On-going patient engagement is vital and will occur through regular meetings, progress reports, and an in-person dissemination planning meeting to share lessons learned and develop messages and vehicles for disseminating the study findings. Anticipated impact: Our results will have the potential to immediately impact how obesity is treated in rural primary care offices. The treatment approaches tested in this study meet the needs of rural patients, could easily be adopted by other physicians, and have potential to impact payment policies, treatment guidelines, and training of practitioners.|
|Record History:||('2017: Project extended to 2021',)|